Use cases / Claim vetting
Claim vetting
Flag the tells of an overstated claim: vendor sourcing, missing evidence, unfair comparisons, false precision.
Recipes
Vet a claim with five typed questions
Send a social post or article claim as state, ask who's making it, whether there's checkable evidence, whether its numbers show their method, whether comparisons are fair, and how promotional it reads. Your code turns the five answers into a verdict. This is the rubric behind every entry on this site.
Directory entries
TypeSafe: 193.6× faster, 444.6× cheaper
Vendor claim by TypeSafe AI, added 15 Sep 2026
MisleadingNot yet tested by us
Jev is 40–200× faster and 40–400× cheaper than frontier LLMs, peaking at 193.6× and 444.6× on TypeSafe's workflows.
JevClaim vetting
“Jev can't hallucinate”
Vendor claim by Launch marketing, added 15 Sep 2026
MisleadingNot yet tested by us
Because outputs are typed, Jev cannot hallucinate.
JevClaim vetting
Laya: “6–8× faster than Jev”
Vendor claim by Convai Innovations, added 18 Sep 2026
MisleadingNot yet tested by us
At 32.8 ms per question on one GPU, Laya is 6 to 8 times faster than Jev.
LayaJevClaim vetting
Laya's 0.766 benchmark accuracy
Vendor claim by Convai Innovations, added 18 Sep 2026
MisleadingNot yet tested by us
Laya reaches 0.766 on the typed-decisions benchmark.
LayaClaim vetting
This category sponsor slot is open. Sponsors are labeled and never change a verdict.See sponsorship